Lark vs. Airtable: The Ultimate Showdown of Project Management Tools

Lark vs. Airtable: The Ultimate Showdown of Project Management Tools

Portrait of Jessica Lark's Author
Portrait of Jessica Lark's Author

Jessica O

August 1, 2023


Aug 1, 2023


4 min read

Lark vs. Airtable: Which is the best project management tool?
Lark vs. Airtable: Which is the best project management tool?
Lark vs. Airtable: Which is the best project management tool?
Lark vs. Airtable: Which is the best project management tool?

Team collaboration is the cornerstone of successful businesses, and with the rise of hybrid work and distributed teams, online collaboration has become more important than ever.

There are different collaboration software options available to streamline team collaboration, but two that stand out are Lark and Airtable. In this post, we'll compare both collaboration apps and help you determine which one is best for your team.

What is Airtable?

Airtable is a powerful online collaboration platform that combines the flexibility of a spreadsheet with the functionalities of a database. It has gained immense popularity due to its versatility and adaptability to various use cases. Let's delve into what Airtable is used for and how teams currently leverage its features for collaboration and project management:

  1. Project Management: Airtable's customizable database structure adapts to different project workflows, making it a good tool for planning and managing projects of varying complexities.

  2. Content Planning and Editorial Calendars: With the ability to assign tasks, collaborate on ideas, set publication dates, and track performance metrics, Airtable streamlines content production and ensures a smooth editorial workflow.

  3. Customer Relationship Management (CRM): Sales and support teams can use Airtable to store and organize customer data, track interactions, manage leads, and monitor the sales pipeline effectively.

What is Lark?

Lark is an all-in-one communication, collaboration, and productivity tool designed to streamline team workflows. Similar to Airtable, it offers a wide range of project management features, but it goes beyond by providing additional tools like business instant messaging, audio and video conferencing, workflow automations, approval flows, OKRs, and more.

What is Lark used for?

Here are a few examples of what Lark can be used for:

Lark vs. Airtable Pricing

When considering collaboration software, pricing plays a crucial role. Airtable offers a tiered pricing structure, starting with a free plan that includes basic features. For more advanced functionalities and increased capacity, they have paid plans that can go up to $20 per seat per month.

Lark, on the other hand, offers a range of plans tailored to different business needs and is free for up to 50 users per month. Lark's paid plan provides access to a comprehensive set of communication and collaboration tools and is priced at $12/user/month.

Streamlining Project Management: Comparing Lark and Airtable's Features

Both Lark and Airtable offer project management capabilities, but their approaches differ. Airtable's strength lies in its customizable spreadsheets, which can be adapted to fit various project management styles. It allows teams to create and organize tasks, set deadlines, and track progress in a visually appealing way.

Lark, on the other hand, takes a more holistic approach to project management. It offers dedicated project management features, such as task assignment, progress tracking, Gantt charts, and timeline views. This comprehensive approach makes Lark an ideal choice for teams seeking a centralized platform for all their collaboration needs.

Template Showdown: Comparing Lark and Airtable's Powerful Templates

Templates can significantly expedite the collaboration process by providing pre-designed structures for various tasks. Airtable offers a diverse collection of templates tailored to different industries and purposes, allowing teams to jump-start their projects.

Lark, too, provides templates that cater to common business needs. Notably, Lark's flexibility enables users to create custom templates for specific use cases like building a personalized CRM or ATS (Applicant Tracking System).

Support: Lark's White Glove Set-up vs. Airtable's Support Procedures

When it comes to customer support, Lark takes an extra step with its white glove set-up. This personalized onboarding experience ensures that businesses get the most out of Lark from the start.

On the other hand, Airtable offers standard support procedures, which may suffice for some users but do not match the level of attention provided by Lark's white glove approach.

Data Capture Simplified: A Comparison of Lark Forms and Airtable Forms

Forms are essential for gathering data and feedback from teams and external stakeholders. Both Lark and Airtable offer form-building features to create customized data collection forms for various purposes.

Airtable's form functionality is integrated into its spreadsheets, providing a familiar interface for form creation. Lark's forms seamlessly integrate with its collaboration suite, allowing teams to collect and analyze data within a unified platform.


In conclusion, Lark and Airtable are both powerful team collaboration apps, but they cater to different needs. Airtable excels in its flexible spreadsheet-style approach, making it ideal for businesses seeking customizable solutions. On the other hand, Lark's comprehensive product offers an all-in-one solution, combining communication, collaboration, productivity tools, project management and much more.

If your team requires a versatile platform with project management capabilities, Airtable might be the right choice. However, if you're looking for a more comprehensive solution that streamlines your team's workflows end-to-end, Lark emerges as the clear winner.

Grow your business with Lark! Reach out to us to try out Lark's powerful project management and collaboration features:

Keep reading

Keep reading

Pay less to get more today

No more redundant tools. Save time and costs.