Blog center Lark insights Comparisons Sales & CRM Project management AI & Automation Team collaboration People management Retail Food & Beverage Technology & IT Marketing Lark news News mentions

Excel Review: Breakdowns of Features, Benefits, and Limits

Ryan Tanner

Product Marketing Specialist

Sep 18, 2026

Ryan Tanner

Product Marketing Specialist

Sep 18, 2026

Try Lark for free

14 min read

For over three decades, Microsoft Excel has been the undisputed king of the workplace. From the accounting desks of Fortune 500 companies to the "performance review template Excel" files sitting in an HR manager's folder, its influence is everywhere. It is a tool that defines how we organize data, calculate risk, and track progress.

However, as businesses move toward hybrid work and real-time collaboration, the traditional spreadsheet is being pushed to its limits. In this Microsoft Excel review, we will dissect whether Excel remains a viable "all-in-one" solution for modern teams or if it has become a legacy bottleneck that hinders growth.

What is Microsoft Excel used for today?

Originally built for financial analysis, Excel has evolved into a general-purpose tool used across nearly every business function. In a modern Microsoft Excel review, it is often described as a flexible starting point for teams that need structure without formal systems. Its adaptability makes it especially popular in HR, operations, and IT. This broad usage explains why Excel remains deeply embedded in daily workflows despite growing limitations.

Financial modeling: Excel is widely used to build budgets, forecasts, and profit and loss statements across organizations. Finance teams rely on formulas and link sheets to model scenarios quickly. This flexibility supports ad hoc decision-making without complex setup. Over time, large models become harder to audit and maintain accurately.

HR management: HR teams frequently use a free employee performance review template in Excel to manage goals, ratings, and review cycles. A performance review template Excel allows customization of scoring methods and evaluation criteria. This works well for early-stage processes. Consistency and data privacy become challenges as teams grow.

Inventory tracking: Excel helps small and mid-sized teams track inventory levels, reorder points, and supplier details. Spreadsheets provide a simple way to visualize stock movement. Manual updates make this manageable at low volumes. Errors increase as inventory complexity grows.

IT audits: IT teams often maintain access logs using a user access review template in Excel. This approach documents users, roles, and approval status in one place. It is easy to set up quickly. However, access control and audit readiness are difficult to enforce securely.

Project management: Managers use Excel to create task lists, timelines, and Gantt-style views. The blank structure allows fast customization for internal initiatives. Teams can adapt layouts as priorities change. Collaboration becomes difficult as more contributors edit the same file.

Despite the rise of specialized SaaS tools, Excel's "blank canvas" appeal makes it the first choice for managers who need to build a custom tracker quickly without waiting for IT approval.

Image source: microsoft.com

Microsoft Excel review: Core features and capabilities

Excel's long-standing position in the workplace is built on a set of core features that make it both powerful and adaptable. In a comprehensive Microsoft Excel review, these capabilities are often cited as the reason Excel continues to be used across finance, HR, operations, and IT. The tool allows teams to design custom solutions without waiting for specialized software or IT involvement. At the same time, the same flexibility that makes Excel powerful can also introduce complexity, risk, and maintenance challenges as usage scales.

The calculation engine: At the heart of Excel is a robust calculation engine with more than 450 built-in functions. These functions enable teams to perform a range of tasks, from basic arithmetic to advanced statistical and logical analysis. In HR use cases, a performance review template Excel can automatically calculate weighted averages, rankings, and overall scores across multiple criteria. This reduces manual calculation errors and speeds up the evaluation software. However, as formulas become nested and interconnected across sheets, troubleshooting and auditing calculations becomes increasingly difficult.

PivotTables and data visualization: PivotTables are one of Excel's most valued features for analyzing large volumes of data. They allow users to quickly group, filter, and summarize thousands of rows into meaningful insights. Managers frequently use PivotTables to analyze performance scores, budget variances, or operational trends. Combined with charts and Power Query, Excel supports more advanced reporting than earlier versions. Despite this power, PivotTables still require manual refreshes and careful data preparation to avoid misleading results.

Customizability via VBA and macros: For advanced users, Excel functions as a lightweight development platform through VBA and macros. Organizations use these tools to automate repetitive processes such as monthly reporting, data validation, or system exports. This level of customization can significantly improve efficiency and reduce manual effort. However, VBA scripts are often poorly documented and maintained by a small number of users. When those users leave, businesses may struggle to support or update critical workflows.

Extensive template ecosystem: Excel's vast template ecosystem plays a major role in its widespread adoption. Teams can quickly download or create an Excel performance review template, project tracker, or audit checklist and begin working immediately. Templates help standardize processes in early stages and reduce setup time. They are especially popular for HR and administrative workflows. Over time, templates often become heavily modified, inconsistent, and difficult to scale across departments.

Data accuracy and risk in spreadsheet-driven processes: As Excel files grow in size and importance, data accuracy becomes a major concern. Spreadsheet-driven workflows are prone to broken formulas, accidental overwrites, and inconsistent data entry. A shared performance review template Excel can quickly fragment into multiple versions, each containing different updates. Limited access controls make it difficult to protect sensitive information. These risks increase when Excel is used as a long-term system of record rather than a temporary working tool.

Pricing: Microsoft Excel plans

Excel's pricing structure reflects its evolution from a standalone spreadsheet tool into a broader productivity platform. In a typical Microsoft Excel review, pricing is evaluated based on user access, storage, and advanced capabilities such as AI assistance. Microsoft offers multiple plans to support individuals, families, and business users with varying needs. Understanding these options is essential for teams assessing long-term cost, flexibility, and feature access.

Plan	Annual price	Users	Storage	Key Excel features
Excel (Free)	Free	1	5 GB	Web-only access with basic real-time collaboration
Personal	$99.99/year	1	1 TB	Desktop apps, Copilot AI in Excel, advanced formulas, and charts
Family	$129.99/year	1–6	6 TB total	All personal features are shared across up to six users
Premium	$199.99/year	1–6	6 TB total	Highest Copilot AI usage limits and exclusive design tools

Image source: microsoft.com

Information source: microsoft.com

Update time: 2025-12-29

Note: Pricing and plan details reflect publicly available data as of the update date and may vary based on region, billing cycle, and number of agents.

The "AI Pivot": The AI pivot in Excel pricing became more visible in 2025, as higher Personal and Family plan costs at $99.99 and $129.99 were driven largely by the inclusion of Copilot. This AI capability allows users to write formulas, analyze trends, and generate charts through natural language prompts. While this enhances productivity, it also raises the baseline cost for individuals who may not fully use AI features.

Business flexibility: From a business standpoint, Excel still offers license flexibility. Organizations can mix and match plans across teams, assigning lower-tier options to frontline staff while providing Premium licenses to HR or IT managers who require advanced security and AI usage. This approach helps control costs while maintaining access where it matters most.

Free alternatives: For lighter use cases, free alternatives remain available. The web version of Excel is accessible to anyone with a Microsoft account and supports basic collaboration. However, it lacks advanced power features, deeper analytics, and AI-driven functionality, limiting its suitability for complex or recurring business workflows.

Save your budget with a new alternative now

Try pricing calculator

Team choice: Excel review for small teams vs growing organizations

Whether Excel remains effective depends largely on team size, process complexity, and collaboration needs. For early-stage teams, spreadsheets often feel fast, familiar, and sufficient for basic tracking. As organizations grow, however, Excel's limitations become more visible in areas like data security, workflow coordination, and reporting reliability. This comparison helps teams understand when Excel still works well and when scaling demands a more structured, collaborative approach.

Small teams (1-10 people): For small teams, Excel is often a practical and cost-effective solution for basic tracking needs. The human overhead of managing a few spreadsheets is relatively low, and collaboration usually happens informally. Teams can move quickly without worrying about complex permissions or workflows. Using a free employee performance review template in Excel helps introduce structure without major change management. At this stage, the simplicity and familiarity of Excel often outweigh its limitations.

Growing organizations (20+ people): As organizations grow, Excel increasingly struggles to keep up with operational demands. Multiple contributors create version control issues and reduce confidence in data accuracy. The need for stronger data security, automated reminders, and a single source of truth becomes unavoidable. Managers spend more time fixing formulas and reconciling files than acting on insights. At this scale, the hidden costs of Excel often exceed the investment in a dedicated collaboration platform.

Get ready to transform your team's productivity

Try now

Benefits: Where Excel attracts the team

Microsoft Excel remains the gold standard for data management because it balances deep analytical power with a familiar, accessible interface. With current updates, its benefits have expanded significantly through AI integration and advanced data handling.

Superior processing power: Excel handles massive datasets (up to 1,048,576 rows) far more smoothly than browser-based tools. Because it runs locally on your hardware, it doesn't suffer from the lag or "freezing" that occurs in cloud sheets when performing complex calculations on large files.

Advanced data modeling: With tools like Power Pivot and Power Query, Excel allows you to perform sophisticated ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) processes. You can connect multiple external data sources, create relational models, and clean millions of rows of data without needing a separate database.

Deep financial & statistical functions: Excel features a more extensive library of specialized formulas for engineering, statistical analysis, and complex finance (such as XNPV, XIRR, and advanced Solver parameters) that are often more robust than their cloud counterparts.

Offline accessibility & security: Since Excel lives on your hard drive, you can work without an internet connection. For sensitive industries, this also provides a layer of protection, as data can be kept entirely on a local server or encrypted machine rather than in a cloud environment.

Legacy & customization (VBA): Excel's Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) allows for near-limitless automation. Many industries rely on legacy macros that have been refined over decades to handle specific business logic that cloud-based "no-code" tools cannot yet replicate.

Limitations: Where Excel starts to fall short for teams

As organizations grow, Excel often shifts from a helpful tool to a fragile system of record. What begins as a simple spreadsheet-based process gradually becomes harder to manage, audit, and scale. In many Microsoft Excel review discussions, teams describe this phase as the point where process discipline breaks down rather than the software itself. These limitations become most visible when multiple contributors, sensitive data, and recurring workflows are involved.

The Chaos of version control: Excel often leads to "Version Hell" because every shared file creates a disconnected duplicate rather than a single source of truth. Without a unified live document, teams risk making critical personnel decisions based on outdated data, which frequently leads to costly errors in performance tracking.

Lack of granular permission controls: Security is difficult to maintain because the software cannot restrict specific cells or rows for different users. This "all-or-nothing" access model makes it nearly impossible to protect sensitive salary data while still allowing managers to edit performance scores in the same file.

Absence of real-time communication: A Microsoft Excel review reveals that the tool lacks built-in chat, forcing teams to move their discussions to separate email threads or messaging apps. This disconnect between the data and the conversation leads to a loss of context and creates significant delays in the feedback loop during review season.

Zero workflow automation: A standard performance review template in Excel is a passive document that cannot trigger automatic notifications or route a form to the next level of approval. Without these automated triggers, the administrative burden falls entirely on human memory, which often results in missed deadlines and skipped steps in the process.

Mobile incompatibility: Navigating a complex Excel performance review template on a mobile device is often a frustrating experience due to the lack of a responsive interface and the difficulty of tapping small cells. This mobile friction discourages leaders from completing evaluations on the go, creating administrative bottlenecks until they can return to a desktop computer.

To overcome these spreadsheet bottlenecks, forward-thinking organizations are moving toward unified platforms that treat data as a living part of the team's communication. Lark bridges these gaps by combining the analytical depth of a spreadsheet with the speed of instant messaging and the precision of automated workflows.

Need a solution that works for your whole team?

Contact sales

How Lark supports structured reviews beyond spreadsheets

As teams outgrow spreadsheet-based review processes, the need for structure, consistency, and collaboration becomes more urgent. Excel works well for online-time tracking, but recurring reviews demand clearer ownership, controlled workflows, and real-time visibility. This is where Lark approaches reviews differently, treating them as living processes rather than static files. By combining structured data, collaboration, and automation, Lark helps teams manage reviews reliably without the risks and overhead of traditional spreadsheets.

Structured database with live rows and columns

Like Excel, Lark Base supports tabular data with rows, columns, and field types, but it adds structure that spreadsheets lack. Instead of free-form cells, teams define fields such as ratings, owners, review cycles, and statuses, which reduces errors and enforces consistency. This makes Base far more reliable than Excel for recurring reviews like performance evaluations or access audits.

Lark Base as a structured alternative to Excel sheets

Built-in formulas with fewer error risks

Lark Base includes formula fields that work similarly to Excel formulas but are applied at the field level rather than individual cells. Teams can calculate scores, averages, weighted ratings, or compliance status automatically across records without copying formulas row by row. This removes a common Excel risk, broken or overwritten formulas, while keeping calculations transparent and consistent.

Native collaboration instead of shared Excel files

Excel often relies on , versioning, or manual merge steps. In Lark Base, multiple reviewers can work on the tables simultaneously, leave comments, and @ teammates directly on specific records. This eliminates version conflicts and ensures review discussions stay connected to the actual data, not scattered across emails or chat threads.

Review workflows that go beyond spreadsheets

Excel can store review data, but it cannot manage the review process itself. With Lark Approval, reviews can follow defined stages: draft, manager review, HR approval, and final sign-off automatically. Administrators can set up complex workflows, assign approvers, and sync approval data for analytics and reminders. Also, approval data can be synchronized with Lark Base for efficient data management, turning static reviews into active, trackable workflows.

Real-time reporting without manual Excel updates

Excel reporting often requires refreshing pivot tables or rebuilding charts. Lark Base dashboards update automatically as review data changes, showing completion rates, score distributions, or overdue reviews in real time. Also, it supports native pivot tables, supporting features like quick detail view, custom sorting, and one-click table generation. With these dashboards, leaders gain instant visibility without waiting for files to be updated or consolidated manually.

Pricing:

Lark isn't just a collection of tools; it's a unified workspace. A single subscription unlocks the full suite—Messenger, Base, Calendar, Docs, OKR, and more into a single platform.

Starter plan: Free forever plan that includes 11 powerful tools for up to 20 users. It also comes with 100GB of storage, 1000 automation runs, AI translations, and more.

Basic plan: $6/user/month (billed annually) for up to 500 users. It includes everything in Starter plus group calling for up to 500 attendees, 5TB of storage, 1000 automation runs, and more. For more details, please contact sales.

Pro plan: $12/user/month (billed annually) for up to 500 users. It includes everything in Basic plus group calling for up to 500 attendees, 15TB of storage, 50,000 automation runs, and more.

Enterprise plan: Contact sales for custom pricing. Supports unlimited users and includes even more automation runs and advanced security, compliance, and management features.

Starter

Pro

Enterprise

Starter

For small teams with simple communication needs

/ user / month

Try for free

No credit card needed

20 users max

18 months message history

1-on-1 video meetings

100 GB storage

Lark Docs & Mail

1000 Base automation runs/month

2000 rows per table in Base

When Excel is enough and when to move on

Excel continues to be a valuable tool, but its effectiveness depends on how and where it is used. Some workflows benefit from Excel's flexibility and deep calculation capabilities, while others suffer from its lack of collaboration and automation. Understanding these differences helps teams avoid forcing Excel into roles it was never designed to handle. This section outlines when Excel remains the right choice and when it becomes a bottleneck.

Keep Excel if:

Excel remains one of the strongest tools for advanced modeling that requires deep control over formulas, assumptions, and scenarios. Finance and engineering teams benefit from its flexibility when building large, calculation-heavy models. Features like nested formulas, solver, and add-ins support detailed analysis. In these cases, Excel's analytical depth outweighs its collaboration limits.

Excel works well when individuals or small teams operate independently. Offline access allows uninterrupted work without relying on connectivity. Version control issues are minimal when few people touch the file. For solo analysts or specialists, Excel remains efficient and reliable.

Excel is often the safest common format when collaborating with external vendor management, auditors, or clients. File compatibility is rarely an issue within Microsoft ecosystems. Sharing spreadsheets avoids onboarding others with new tools. This makes Excel practical for cross-organization data exchange.

Move on to Lark if:

Unlike fragmented Excel files that multiply and create data silos, Lark keeps everything in a single, cloud-based "base." This ensures every contributor works on the same "source of truth," eliminating the need for manual reconciliation and boosting decision-making confidence.

Lark transforms dense spreadsheets into mobile-friendly views and forms. Managers can easily review data, toggle views, and provide feedback on the go, removing the friction and delays typically caused by navigating small cells on a phone.

Lark eliminates the "stale data" problem by connecting directly to your other business tools. Instead of manual imports and refreshes, your data updates automatically in real-time, allowing teams to be proactive rather than reactive.

Lark bridges the gap between data and action with built-in automation. It can natively trigger instant reminders, automated approval, and follow-up steps within the chat interface, ensuring no process stalls due to human forgetfulness.

Because Lark integrates messaging directly with its data tables, teams can discuss specific records in the same window. This eliminates the need for external emails and ensures all context remains attached to the relevant data points.

Conclusion

Microsoft Excel will continue to play an important role in the business world, especially for deep analysis, complex calculations, and individual data work. It remains a powerful tool for financial modeling, ad hoc analysis, and standalone tasks where flexibility matters most. However, as this Excel review shows, problems emerge when spreadsheets are stretched into systems for recurring, team-based processes such as performance reviews, access audits, and approvals. Version control issues, manual coordination, and limited automation gradually reduce efficiency and confidence in the data.

For teams that have outgrown spreadsheets, the next step is not just finding a better spreadsheet but adopting a more connected way of working. Collaborative platforms like Lark approach reviews and operational processes as living workflows, where data, communication, and automation exist together. This shift helps teams reduce administrative overhead, improve visibility, and focus more on decisions and outcomes rather than managing files.

Ready to move beyond the spreadsheet?

Get started

FAQs

How secure is Excel for managing access reviews?

Excel allows basic protection through passwords, but it lacks granular row-level or role-based permissions. This makes it risky for sensitive user access review template Excel workflows. Files are easily duplicated or shared unintentionally. As requirements grow stricter, teams often look for tools with built-in access control, gradually exploring platforms like Lark.

Can Excel handle multi-reviewer workflows effectively?

Excel does not include native workflow routing or task assignment. Moving a review from one stage to another depends on manual updates or complex VBA scripts. This increases errors and delays as reviewers increases. Teams needing structured handoffs often supplement Excel with collaborative tools such as Lark.

What are common Excel errors in performance reviews?

Broken formulas, inconsistent rating entries, and accidental data overwrites are frequent issues. Sensitive information may also be exposed when files are shared incorrectly. These problems multiply as more managers contribute to a performance review template in Excel. To reduce these risks, some teams begin adopting structured, collaborative systems like Lark.

When should teams replace Excel with a collaborative system?

Teams should consider switching when they spend hours each week managing files instead of acting on insights. Frequent version checks, reminders, and manual follow-ups are strong warning signs. As review cycles become more complex, Excel becomes a bottleneck. This is often when teams start evaluating collaboration-first platforms such as Lark.

How does Excel handle scalability as review cycles grow?

Excel struggles as review cycles expand across departments or regions. Large files slow down, errors increase, and coordination becomes difficult. Managing multiple reviewers leads to duplicated versions and missed updates. At this stage, teams often seek scalable alternatives like Lark to support growth without added complexity.